When George W. was asked if he had consulted with this father prior to making the decision to attack Iraq, he responded that he went to “a higher father”. Many of my good friends here in Utah immediately got a peaceful “Stepford wife” look on their faces and began nodding knowingly. I, for one, felt an icy cold chill.
What is it that allows even the goofiest reference to a higher power to shut down all of the real thought processes in our all to human brains. Why are so many of us comforted by such a reference when even a cursory look at our history shows that most of the time people governing in the name of God have allowed some of the most harrowing and evil actions that have ever occurred in the annals of time. To look logically at such a statement by our president at such a time should scare the socks off all of us.
First, how do we know that his version of a higher father bears any relationship to ours (philosophically speaking, do any two people see God in exactly the same way)? For example, what if W’s vision of himself is that he is an instrument in the hand of God who has been ordained to bring about the second coming of the Lord. Is this something we really want to leave for W to decide? That, in his version of religious nirvana, the prophecies of the apocalypse and Armageddon must be brought to pass, and attacking Iraq is a sure way to get the ball rolling. Maybe his view is not that proactive, but his underlying belief in all of that makes him much less concerned about the possibility that he might be making a monumental mistake. Self-fulfillment of prophecy is not normally real. What in George’s past, present active demeanor or attitude would lead any of us to truly believe that he has the remotest possibility of attaining a direct line to God?
Second, and I think this far more likely, he doesn’t really have an underlying belief in all of this, but is using the reference to dupe the true believer and get a pass on some frighteningly suspect logic. The fact that this may be the case should leave us to ponder why such references lead so many to accept being duped so readily. Why does the invocation of the use of faith require that we dispense with logic altogether to prove how strong is our faith, and therefore how holy we must be (among the faithful)!
Third, how selective our “faith” becomes. Jerry Fallwell asked the faithful to believe that Bill Clinton was guilty of (maybe multiple) murders and for a small “donation” he would send the “proof” (in VHS or DVD). It was, of course, utter nonsense; but it raised a ton of money for the cause of “faith”. On the other hand, Dick Cheney shot a guy in the face with a shotgun while slaughtering helpless quail in a staged “hunt”, and we are being asked to believe that we should send our heartfelt sympathy … to Cheney. Pat Robertson’s repeated invocation of the supposed will of God becomes ever more ludicrous and outrageous. He should be tarred and feathered, or utterly ignored. But instead his statements only further his cause of feathering his own nest (in the cause of faith).
In a much less frivolous sense, we believe that Abraham is the absolute paragon of true faith (and ironically the father of all three major God based religions) because, among other actions, he was willing to bind his own son and place him on an alter to commit his murder. What faith, such obedience, truly here was a man of God. The Lafferty’s are heinous murderers for having the “faith” to follow through with the murder of their sister-in-law and nephew. They said (and insist today) that God ordered the sacrifice. What lunatics they are! Once you open the door to the belief that God will, and has, ordered individuals to commit what otherwise would have been considered unspeakable criminal destruction, then how does our faith serve us?
In the Book of Mormon story, was Nephi a brave hero in the faith, or a burglar and murderer when he stole the plates of Laban? I’m not attempting sacrilege here because I believe that the idea of sacrilege in the first place is an ugly riot in the making. And for what, cartoons penned by an infidel? Muslims have used the fear of sacrilege to keep the Arab masses down for centuries and to enable them to fight their tyranny. Heaven forbid you tease my Mohammed about his turban but I can devastate Mohammed’s Golden Dome Mosque in retribution for the slightest wrong.
Fourth, just like Christians, Jews and Muslims like to point to Abraham as the father of their faith (Mormons tag actual lineage to Abraham through patriarchal blessings). Americans like to point to the creation and organization of the United States in a religious sense which we use again and again to justify some of the goofiest causes eg: slavery, denying women the right to vote and now denying homosexuals a number of common civil rights. Christians believe they are endowed with special rights under “their” constitution (Mormons believe the constitution was divinely inspired) and point to hints in the writings of the forefathers to substantiate their belief that the United States is, and always will be, a Christian nation. The fact is, that most of the forefathers were Deists (not Christians), and even this did not stop them from instilling the Constitution with prohibitions against letting government get involved in religious creation or substantiation. Many of the intrepid settlers of our nation came here expressly to avoid religious tyranny, not surprisingly imposed by European Christians, but eventually every religion in the world at some time or another has forced members of their community to emigrate through some form of religious tyranny. Today Christians in America are whipping up a little religious tyranny of their own. Ironically, Mormons think they are included in the Christian Right (though why they want to be is a mystery), they are not. President Carter wrote in his book, “Our Endangered Values” that one of the things that really got him crosswise with the newly emerging Christian Right was his effort to assist the Latter Day Saint faith with problems they were having with their international missionary program. LDS members as a whole hate the ACLU, but may need that organization to once again protect their right to exist once the Christian Right assumes the national power they crave. Members of the LDS faith are just as guilty of this unholy desire to control state and local governments in spite of specific “revelation from God” prohibiting it. D&C 134:9 clearly instructs, “We do not believe it just to mingle religious influence with civil government.” This didn’t stop us from passing the “Larry H. Miller” law forbidding auto dealerships from operating on Sunday, all to protect the pious Miller from Sunday competition. I could have admired him for exercising his religious beliefs by voluntarily closing his many dealerships on Sunday, like the owners of Macy’s grocery stores do. But I revile him for using his religious and political muscle to force all dealerships to do the same. If I’m Jewish or Seventh Day Adventist, my belief keeps me from shopping on Saturday and the state forbids me to shop Sunday. Ironically, Christ exercised his Sabbath on Saturday (Only when the pagan Romans hijacked Christianity did Sunday become the Sabbath to replace its own day of worship of the sun). Saturday is the seventh day of the week when God supposedly rested.
Most Mormons believe there should be open, organized prayer in schools and other pubic gatherings. Like all religions, they believe the prayer should be of their own choosing. It was a Mormon and Catholic who joined together to bring suit against a Texas school district to end organized prayer by the good Christians that regularly contained the incantation “protect us from these cultists” (i.e., Mormons and Catholics). Most of my LDS associates don’t get the irony.
As it turns out, W should indeed have consulted his real father who had the sense not to mire us in the senseless and hopeless job of forcing Iraq to change regimes. Dick Cheney, then Defense Secretary, was most eloquent in describing the disaster that we would have inherited by physically removing Hussain. That, of course, was before he was made CEO of Halliburton, and recognized the phenomenal profits that we gullible citizens of God’s Country would lavish on his corporate entity to go in and finish the job. He, and all of his corporate buddies have been saying “Thank you, Jesus!” ever since. No real problem that the conflict was entered by Dick and W on the flimsiest excuse for a war ever “created”. They apparently did it on faith, which is odd because this whole episode is utterly devoid of “intelligent design”. May God save us from the faithful!
